The American Gaming Association (AGA) recently announced the findings of a new study, conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago, which challenges conventional wisdom about gamblers and sheds light on the self-perception of prediction market participants. The research, titled "Gambling and Financial Literacy: A Joint Study," indicates that gamblers generally possess higher rates of financial literacy than non-gamblers, while users of prediction markets tend to overestimate their mathematical abilities.
Read our Prediction Market Report 2026 here.
Gamblers' Financial Acumen
Contrary to some popular beliefs, the study revealed that gamblers demonstrate a statistically significant higher level of financial literacy. Gamblers scored an average of 3.93 out of five on a widely used financial literacy index, compared to 3.72 among non-gamblers. Furthermore, 41% of gamblers were classified as highly financially literate, in contrast to 27% of non-gamblers. This financial savviness was particularly pronounced among sports bettors and iGaming participants.
Prediction Market Users' Math Overestimation
A key finding pertinent to the prediction markets beat is the tendency of their users to misjudge their mathematical skillset. While prediction market participants expressed nearly as much confidence in their mathematical skills as sports bettors, their objective performance on math tests aligned more closely with that of non-gamblers. This suggests a notable overestimation of their mathematical prowess within this segment. David Forman, AGA's Vice President of Research, highlighted the risks of prediction markets marketing sports betting as investing against peers, potentially misleading consumers into believing that intelligence alone guarantees success.
Methodology and Broader Implications
The study involved a national online survey of 3,201 U.S. adults, with a final sample of 3,149 participants after data-quality screening. This included 574 prediction market users, alongside sports bettors, casino players, iGaming users, and non-gamblers. The research also established a positive connection between financial literacy and responsible play, suggesting that financial literacy education could enhance responsible gaming resources by improving consumers' understanding of risk.
Background on Prediction Market Research
This study contributes to a growing body of academic research exploring the behavioral economics and participant demographics of prediction markets. Understanding how users perceive their own abilities, particularly in areas like financial literacy and mathematical reasoning, is crucial for evaluating market efficiency, potential for manipulation, and the overall integrity of forecasting mechanisms. Previous research has often focused on the accuracy of prediction markets as forecasting tools, but this study delves into the characteristics of the participants themselves, offering a more nuanced view of the human element in these markets.
What to Watch
The findings from the AGA-commissioned study could prompt further discussion among regulators and prediction market operators regarding consumer protection and responsible participation. It may encourage platforms to consider how they frame their offerings and to provide clearer information about the nature of event contracts. Future research might delve deeper into the specific cognitive biases prevalent among prediction market users and explore targeted educational interventions to foster more accurate self-assessment and informed decision-making. The AGA's emphasis on the distinction between gambling and investment, particularly in the context of prediction markets, suggests continued scrutiny from industry bodies.
Original announcement: American Gaming Association